From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berkowitz v. Fluhr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

October, 1933.


Order of the Appellate Term reversed on the law, with costs, and judgment of the City Court, City of New York, County of Queens, reinstated, on the ground that it was a question of fact, determined in plaintiff's favor, that the defendant was negligent in unlawfully obstructing the sidewalk and thereby causing the plaintiff's injuries. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berkowitz v. Fluhr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Berkowitz v. Fluhr

Case Details

Full title:LESTER BERKOWITZ, an Infant, under Fourteen Years of Age, by His Guardian…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)