Berkery v. Experian PLC

Full title: JOHN C. BERKERY, SR., Plaintiff v. EXPERIAN PLC ET AL., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Civil Action 21-1250 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1250

03-09-2022

JOHN C. BERKERY, SR., Plaintiff v. EXPERIAN PLC ET AL., Defendants

GENE E.K. PRATTER, JUDGE.

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER, JUDGE.

AND NOW, this 9^th Day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant First Premier Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiff John Berkery's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 23), Defendant Trans Union's Counterclaim (Doc. No. 26), Mr. Berkery's Motion to Dismiss Trans Union's Counterclaim (Doc. No. 30), Trans Union's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 37), Mr. Berkery's Reply (Doc. No. 38), Defendant United National Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 29), Mr, Berkery's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 33), and United National's Reply (Doc. No. 35), for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant First Premier Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED;

2. Defendant United National Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED; and

3. Plaintiff Mr. Berkery's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED.

AND upon consideration of Mr. Berkery's Motion to Enforce Settlement and Consider Sanctions (Doc. No. 53), Defendant Verizon's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 56), and Mr. Berkery's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Doc. No. 58), for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, it is FURTHER ORDERED that:

4. Mr. Berkery's Motion (Doc. No. 53) is DENIED; and

5. Mr. Berkery's Petition (Doc. No. 58) is DENIED.