From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berkeley v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.


Order, as resettled, vacating notice of examination before trial, reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Defendant is not charged with a crime under section 1433 of the Penal Law. The notice of examination is modified by striking from paragraph 2 thereof the words "notwithstanding that plaintiff had achieved his position with the company solely by merit, ability and industry;" by striking out paragraph 5 in its entirety; by striking from paragraph 9 that part which reads: "and has been unable to obtain another position elsewhere because of said discharge," and by limiting the subpoena duces tecum to those papers only which are in the possession of defendant individually, or in his possession as superintendent of agencies. Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Berkeley v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Berkeley v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK D. BERKELEY, Appellant, v. JAMES P. BRADLEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)