From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-2715 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-2715

12-13-2011

HAROLD R. BERK, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff Harold R. Berk's Second Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint adding an Eighth Cause of Action, the Chase Defendants' response thereto, Plaintiff's reply thereon, and the Chase Defendants' sur-reply thereon, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated December 13, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Document No. 46) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

Berle M. Schiller , J.


Summaries of

Berk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-2715 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Berk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD R. BERK, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-2715 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ulrich v. Diversified Consultants Int'l

To state a claim under the FDCPA, a plaintiff must establish that "(1) he or she is a 'consumer' who is…

Trento v. Flagstar Bank

(1) he or she is a "consumer" who is harmed by violations of the FDCPA; (2) the "debt" arises out of a…