From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berish v. Southwestern Energy Prod. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-1981 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-1981

05-03-2012

SUZANNE BERISH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY and SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY, Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint (Doc. 36) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

(1) Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint stating claims of negligence, private nuisance, strict liability, trespass and violation of the Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act against Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., BJ Services Company, Schlumberger Limited, and Union Drilling, Inc. is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file a Third Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order.
(2) Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint to state a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation against Southwestern Energy Production Company is DENIED.

___________________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Berish v. Southwestern Energy Prod. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-1981 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Berish v. Southwestern Energy Prod. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE BERISH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-1981 (M.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)