From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bergstol v. Town of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06264

May 5, 2003.

Motion by the respondent on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 10, 2002, to strike the appellant's brief or those portions thereof that allegedly refer to matter dehors the record. By decision and order of this court dated January 16, 2003, the motion was held in abeyance and was referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon argument or submission thereof.


DECISION ORDER ON MOTION

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied.

It is axiomatic that this court may take judicial notice of its own orders in related actions (see Lefkowitz v. Lurie, 253 A.D.2d 855; Brandes Meat Corp. v. Cromer, 146 A.D.2d 666). Accordingly, the respondent's motion to strike the appellant's brief or portions of the appellant's brief which refer to this court's order in the prior action involving these parties is denied.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bergstol v. Town of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Bergstol v. Town of Monroe

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BERGSTOL, appellant, v. TOWN OF MONROE, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

A.P. v. F.L.

The court takes judicial notice of the fact that February 13, 2013 was a Wednesday (see Persing, 214 AD2d at…

A.P. v. F.L.

The court takes judicial notice of the fact that February 13, 2013 was a Wednesday (see Persing, 214 A.D.2d…