Opinion
CASE NO. 07-15190
08-19-2011
RICHARD BERGMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.
HONORABLE
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE,
GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ADJOURN TRIAL, AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aerofil's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 52, filed on February 24, 2011]. For the reasons set forth on the record, this motion is DENIED.
This matter is also before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Adjourn Trial Date [Docket No. 70, filed on April 19, 2011]. For the reasons set forth on the record, this motion is GRANTED.
This matter is also before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Motion for Summary Judgment with an Additional Argument [Docket No. 71, filed on May 2, 2011]. For the reasons set forth on the record, this motion is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DENISE PAGE HOOD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, August 19, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5160