From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bergin v. Teamsters Local Union No. 77

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2289 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2289.

February 4, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2011, upon review of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 2], Plaintiff's response [Doc. No. 4], and Defendant's reply [Doc. No. 8], and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's due process claim is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's state law claim that Defendant breached its duty of fair representation is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for Delaware County.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bergin v. Teamsters Local Union No. 77

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2289 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Bergin v. Teamsters Local Union No. 77

Case Details

Full title:CAROL BERGIN, Plaintiff, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 77, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 4, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2289 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Intellicheck Mobilisa, Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.

At the outset, neither case dealt with the issuance of a protective order. See In re. Medtronic, Inc. Sprint…

Eisenbrey v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP

Ranke v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc., 436 F.3d 197, 204 (3d Cir. 2006) (affirming district court's dismissal where…