From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bergin v. Merck & Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jul 7, 2022
22-cv-00117 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-CV-117-RJC-DCK

07-07-2022

PAYTON BERGIN, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP., Defendants.


ORDER

David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 17) filed by Theodore C. Edwards, II, concerning Dino S. Sangiamo, on July 7, 2022. Dino S. Sangiamo seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendants. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 17) is GRANTED. Dino S. Sangiamo is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendants.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bergin v. Merck & Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jul 7, 2022
22-cv-00117 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Bergin v. Merck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:PAYTON BERGIN, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC., and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jul 7, 2022

Citations

22-cv-00117 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 7, 2022)