Summary
In Bergin v. Anderson (215 App. Div. 832) the Appellate Division, Second Department, said: "Notwithstanding the plaintiff's admission of the execution of the agreement mentioned in the answer, plaintiff was entitled to show the conditions upon which the agreement was executed and delivered."
Summary of this case from Royal Indemnity Co. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co.Opinion
January, 1926.
Order granting judgment dismissing the complaint upon the pleadings reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Notwithstanding the plaintiff's admission of the execution of the agreement mentioned in the answer, plaintiff was entitled to show the conditions upon which the agreement was executed and delivered. ( Smith v. Dotterweich, 200 N.Y. 299.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.