Bergh v. Bergh

3 Citing cases

  1. Sawle v. Nicholson

    408 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 3 times

    1 (1986) and Wis.Stat. § 822.03 (1985). See Bergh v. Bergh, 387 N.W.2d 213, 215 (Minn.Ct.App. 1986). Minn.Stat. § 518A.03, subd.

  2. State, ex Rel. Aycock, v. Mowrey

    45 Ohio St. 3d 347 (Ohio 1989)   Cited 46 times

    ; Brown v. Brown (Ala.Civ.App. 1985), 476 So.2d 114 (In interstate child custody matters, the continuing jurisdiction to modify an original custody judgment is lost when the child and both parents have removed themselves from the state where the judgment was entered.); Bergh v. Bergh (Minn.App. 1986), 387 N.W.2d 213 (A state can lose jurisdiction to modify child custody where the parties no longer have a significant connection with the decreeing state.); Beier v. Beier (Minn.App. 1985), 371 N.W.2d 52 (Decreeing state would have primary jurisdiction to hear action to modify custody order if mother had remained there, but where neither parent lived in decreeing state, it would not have jurisdiction at the time of a subsequent custody proceeding.).

  3. Johnson v. Murray

    No. C7-01-480 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 7, 2001)

    To exercise such jurisdiction, A.J. would need to be physically present in Minnesota and either abandoned or "subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse or * * * otherwise neglected or dependent." Id.; see Bergh v. Bergh, 387 N.W.2d 213, 216 (Minn.App. 1986) (requiring child's physical presence in the forum state before emergency jurisdiction can be exerted). Here, A.J. was not physically present in Minnesota at the time of the default-judgment hearing.