From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berger v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1955
125 N.E.2d 876 (N.Y. 1955)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1955

Decided March 3, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, PETTE, J.

Isidore Ginsberg for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Acting Corporation Counsel ( Andrew Bellanca and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondents.



Judgment affirmed, with costs, without prejudice to plaintiff's taking such appropriate action as she may be advised in connection with set-back and area restrictions as to a conforming use. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ. Taking no part: FROESSEL and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Berger v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1955
125 N.E.2d 876 (N.Y. 1955)
Case details for

Berger v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FREDA K. BERGER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 3, 1955

Citations

125 N.E.2d 876 (N.Y. 1955)
125 N.E.2d 876

Citing Cases

Kraushaar Son, Inc. v. City of New York

The suitability of plaintiff's property for the uses to which it is limited is fairly debatable. Under such…