From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berger v. Bell

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 29, 2009
326 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1187.

Submitted: May 19, 2009.

Filed: May 29, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Russell Berger, Arkansas Department of Correction, Brickeys, AR, Appellant.

Suzanne Hixson, Attorney General's Office, Little Rock, AR, Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Russell Berger appeals the district court's partial grant of summary judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Although the parties address the merits of the district court's ruling, we have an independent obligation to examine our own jurisdiction. See Nolles v. State Comm. for Reorg. of Sch. Dists., 524 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 418, 172 L.Ed.2d 288 (2008). Because the summary judgment order clearly left issues unresolved and the district court did not certify the order for interlocutory appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), we find that the order was neither final nor appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Dieser v. Cont'l Cos. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006).

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Thus, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Berger v. Bell

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 29, 2009
326 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Berger v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:Russell BERGER, Appellant, v. BELL, Kitchen Supervisor, East Arkansas…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2009

Citations

326 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2009)