Bergara v. Cate

1 Citing case

  1. Inprasit v. Matteson

    2:20-cv-00643 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2022)

    See McNeil, 541 U.S. at 438 (“Given three correct instructions and one contrary one, the state did not unreasonably apply federal law when it found that there was no reasonable likelihood the jury was misled.”); Bergara v. Cate, 536 Fed.Appx. 744 (9th Cir. 2013); see also Ayers v. Belmontes, 549 U.S. 7, 19-21 (2006); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 146-47 (2005).