Summary
finding plaintiff's description of substance without more was not enough to establish constructive notice
Summary of this case from Torres v. U.S.Opinion
September 30, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Julia W. Berg (plaintiff) when she allegedly slipped on liquid soap and fell in defendant's Canandaigua store. It is undisputed that defendant lacked actual notice of the dangerous condition, and defendant met its burden of establishing lack of constructive notice (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837-838). The assertion of plaintiff in her affidavit that the "sudsy water" was dirty and had stained her clothes is insufficient to raise a question of fact whether defendant had constructive notice (see, Collins v. Grand Union Co., 201 A.D.2d 852, 853).
Defendant also met its burden of establishing that it did not create the dangerous condition. Plaintiff's conclusory assertion that the "puddle of dirty, sudsy water was left on the floor after the floor was cleaned" is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendant created the dangerous condition ( see, Kaufman v. Man-Dell Food Stores, 203 A.D.2d 532, 533).