From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berg v. Unitus Cmty. Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 17, 2014
3:14-CV-00135-AC (D. Or. Sep. 17, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-CV-00135-AC

09-17-2014

BRADLEY L. BERG, Plaintiff, v. UNITUS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#49) on August 11, 2014, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Unitus Community Credit Union's Motion (#11) to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and deny Plaintiff Bradley L. Berg's Motion (#17) to Strike and Motion (#25) for Entry of Default. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#49). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#17) to Strike and Motion (#25) for Entry of Default, GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#11) to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, and DISMISSES this case without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of September, 2014.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Berg v. Unitus Cmty. Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 17, 2014
3:14-CV-00135-AC (D. Or. Sep. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Berg v. Unitus Cmty. Credit Union

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY L. BERG, Plaintiff, v. UNITUS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

3:14-CV-00135-AC (D. Or. Sep. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Premier Funding Grp. LLC v. Aviva Life & Annuity Co.

]" Federal Practice & Procedure § 3612. These cases and commentaries do not provide much explanation for why…