Opinion
No. ED 110404
10-18-2022
Shawn K. BERG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Stephanie A. Hoeplinger, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.
Stephanie A. Hoeplinger, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shawn K. Berg (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order dismissing his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues the dismissal of his motion without an evidentiary hearing was clearly erroneous because he alleged that the circumstances of the untimely filing of his initial pro se motion fell within a recognized exception to Rule 24.035's filing deadline. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude no reversible error occurred. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2022).