From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berg v. Munoz

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 23, 2016
SC: 152250-1 (Mich. Mar. 23, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 152250-1

03-23-2016

DANIEL BERG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NUNZIO MUNOZ, a/k/a NORBERTO MUNOZ, and REBECCA BERG, Defendants-Appellees, and CATHERINE BERG, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 321162, 321645
Newaygo CC: 12-019815-NZ

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the circuit court judgments granting the defendants' motions for summary disposition and for sanctions.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 23, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Berg v. Munoz

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 23, 2016
SC: 152250-1 (Mich. Mar. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Berg v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BERG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NUNZIO MUNOZ, a/k/a NORBERTO MUNOZ…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

SC: 152250-1 (Mich. Mar. 23, 2016)