From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bercari v. Druckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 20, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cannizzaro, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court's finding that the defendant failed to sustain her burden of proving that there were six dwelling units on the subject premises in order to bring it within the ambit of the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of N Y § 26-504 [b]) and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 § 5 (McKinney's Uncons Laws of N Y § 8625 [a] [4] [a]; L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bercari v. Druckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Bercari v. Druckman

Case Details

Full title:MARIO BERCARI et al., Respondents, v. EVELYN DRUCKMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 84