From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benyamini v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2008
1:05-cv-00684-LJO-GSA (HC), (DOCUMENT #59) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)

Opinion

1:05-cv-00684-LJO-GSA (HC), (DOCUMENT #59).

January 28, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE TO ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED PETITION (60) SIXTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 11, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file traverse to answer to second amended petition. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted sixty days from the date of service of this order in which to file a traverse.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Benyamini v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2008
1:05-cv-00684-LJO-GSA (HC), (DOCUMENT #59) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Benyamini v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT P. BENYAMINI, Petitioner, v. TERESA SCHWARTZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2008

Citations

1:05-cv-00684-LJO-GSA (HC), (DOCUMENT #59) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)