From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benyamini v. Hommer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2317 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2317 KJM GGH P

07-09-2012

ROBERT BENYAMINI, Plaintiff, v. M.C. HOMMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 22, 2011, the undersigned issues findings and recommendations that plaintiff's in forma pauperis application be denied and plaintiff pay the filing fee or the case be dismissed. The undersigned noted that plaintiff's motion for a transfer (Doc. 7) would not be ruled upon until the findings and recommendations were addressed. As the findings and recommendations are still pending, plaintiff's motion for a transfer is vacated without prejudice and may be re-filed if the case continues.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for a transfer (Doc. 7) is vacated without prejudice.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Benyamini v. Hommer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2317 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Benyamini v. Hommer

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BENYAMINI, Plaintiff, v. M.C. HOMMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2317 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)