From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benvenuto v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Sep 25, 1919
181 Cal. 293 (Cal. 1919)

Opinion

L. A. No. 6292.

September 25, 1919.

PROCEEDING in prohibition to prevent the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and S.E. Crow, Judge thereof, from confirming a probate sale. Application denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A.C. Postel for Petitioner.


The application for a writ of prohibition is denied.

We deem it proper to say that this denial is without reference to the merits of the legal question attempted to be presented by the application. Regardless of all other questions, we cannot assume to anticipate the action of the trial court on the application for confirmation of the attempted sale referred to in the petition.

It may further be suggested that we are not satisfied that in the event of unfavorable action on the part of the lower court the petitioner's remedy by appeal would not be a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.

All the Justice concurred.


Summaries of

Benvenuto v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Sep 25, 1919
181 Cal. 293 (Cal. 1919)
Case details for

Benvenuto v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:PASTINE MADDALENA BENVENUTO, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Sep 25, 1919

Citations

181 Cal. 293 (Cal. 1919)
184 P. 672

Citing Cases

Heinecke v. Superior Court

This question must be answered in the negative. A writ of prohibition will not issue to restrain the act of…

Citizens Utilities Co. of Cal. v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County

Prohibition may properly issue in the instant situation, since it does not appear that real party will…