From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benvenuto v. Costalos, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 30, 1961
35 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)

Opinion

November 30, 1961

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, JOHN C. LEONFORTE, J.

Louis D. Schwartz and Jay R. Schwartz for appellant.

Maurice Kozinn and Paul Kozinn for respondents.


The statutory method for fixation of the emergency rent (Emergency Business Space Rent Control Law, L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) was not followed. Hence, even though the trial court found that the parties entered into an oral agreement for an increased rental based on the furnishing of a new service, to wit, the supplying of steam heat, it was without jurisdiction to fix the rent or approve such agreement.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order and judgment directed for tenant on its counterclaim in the sum of $190, with costs.

Insofar as the tenant purports to appeal from the judgment determining the amount of rent due the landlord, the judgment not having been entered, it may be regarded as a decision, from which no appeal lies. Accordingly, the appeal from the judgment should be dismissed.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., TILZER and GOLD, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Benvenuto v. Costalos, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 30, 1961
35 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
Case details for

Benvenuto v. Costalos, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IRENE BENVENUTO et al., Respondents, v. B. COSTALOS, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1961

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
232 N.Y.S.2d 320