From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benton v. Goodale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos
Dec 1, 1890
66 N.H. 424 (N.H. 1890)

Opinion

Decided December, 1890.

One who is compelled to pay more than his share of the fees of a collector of taxes, to prevent a tax sale of his land (included with lands of other persons in an advertisement of sale), may recover the excess in assumpsit.

ASSUMPSIT, against a tax-collector for excessive fees paid him by the plaintiff.

W. Heywood, for the plaintiff.

Ladd Fletcher, for the defendant.


The defendant was entitled to one dollar and no more "for advertising" all the lands included in a single advertisement, and the plaintiff was holden to pay no more than "his just proportion" of the defendant's fees. G. L., c. 58, s. 15; c. 59, ss. 16, 17. The plaintiff's payment of more than his share was not voluntary. He was compelled to pay what the defendant demanded to prevent a sale. All action of debt for the penalty prescribed by Gen. Laws, c. 59, s. 18, was not the only remedy. Cardigan v. Page, 6 N.H. 182, 193.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Benton v. Goodale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos
Dec 1, 1890
66 N.H. 424 (N.H. 1890)
Case details for

Benton v. Goodale

Case Details

Full title:BENTON v. GOODALE

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos

Date published: Dec 1, 1890

Citations

66 N.H. 424 (N.H. 1890)
30 A. 1117

Citing Cases

State v. Linsky

It is not necessary to determine whether this rule is applicable in the present case, for a party who has…

Horgan v. Taylor

We think that a payment under these conditions would be a payment under compulsion and that the addition of a…