From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benton-Flores v. Dep't of Def.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 15, 2024
No. 2023-1664 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2023-1664

10-15-2024

REDALE BENTON-FLORES, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent

Christopher Hugh Bonk, Gilbert Employment Law, PC, Silver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner. Also represented by Kevin Owen. Galina I. Fomenkova, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Elizabeth Marie Hosford, Patricia M. McCarthy.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-1221-13-0522-B-2.

Christopher Hugh Bonk, Gilbert Employment Law, PC, Silver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner. Also represented by Kevin Owen.

Galina I. Fomenkova, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Elizabeth Marie Hosford, Patricia M. McCarthy.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

(DYK, HUGHES, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Benton-Flores v. Dep't of Def.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 15, 2024
No. 2023-1664 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Benton-Flores v. Dep't of Def.

Case Details

Full title:REDALE BENTON-FLORES, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2024

Citations

No. 2023-1664 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2024)