From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bentley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 10, 2014
133 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D12–5556.

2014-03-10

Howard E. BENTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge.
Howard E. Bentley, pro se.

CASANUEVA, Judge.

We affirm the postconviction court's summary denial of Howard E. Bentley's motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice for Bentley to refile his motion to state a facially sufficient claim. Such a claim would specifically identify the portions of the record that demonstrate, on their face, his entitlement to relief. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 (Fla.2011). Such a motion shall not be considered successive.

Affirmed. VILLANTI and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bentley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 10, 2014
133 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Bentley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Howard E. BENTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Mar 10, 2014

Citations

133 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)