From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benthos Master Fund, Ltd. v. Etra

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 11, 2022
20-CV-3384 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-3384 (VEC)

12-11-2022

BENTHOS MASTER FUND, LTD., Petitioner, v. AARON ETRA, Respondent.


ORDER

VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge

WHEREAS on November 30, 2022, the Court ordered Petitioner to submit three spreadsheets to inform its contempt motion, see Dkt. 218; and

WHEREAS on December 9, 2022, Petitioner submitted the requested spreadsheets, see Dkt. 243;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that not later than Monday, December 12, 2022 at 11:00 P.M., Petitioner must submit a revised version of the first spreadsheet that: (1) breaks out into a separate row each individual item for which production was sought and not obtained that currently appears in the “Description of Item” column; (2) where ascertainable, specifies the bank and account number for which records are missing; (3) includes no argumentation or commentary in the “Description of Item” column; (4) does not include cross-references to other documents in the “Description of Item” column and states any pertinent information concisely; and (5) adds a column reflecting, for each row, what, if anything, Respondent has produced to satisfy the particular document request. To the extent Petitioner believes there are crossreferences or other information that would be helpful to the Court, it should enter that information concisely in a fifth column.

For example, the first entry should have separate rows for: (1) bank statements since June 30, 2022 for the Piermont 2060 account; (2) bank statements since June 30, 2022 for the M&T 3441 (IOLA) account; and (3) bank statements since June 30, 2022 for the Piermont 2292 (IOLA) account.

For example, the third entry should have separate rows for each known bank account as to which Petitioner contends that Respondent has not produced bank statements for the last five months of 2017, the eighth entry should have separate rows for each known bank and brokerage account that Respondent has not disclosed, and the final entry should have separate row for each known credit card for which Petitioner contends statements are missing (and the particular statements that are missing, e.g., AmEx account 1234, April 2022, should be in separate rows).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Benthos Master Fund, Ltd. v. Etra

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 11, 2022
20-CV-3384 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Benthos Master Fund, Ltd. v. Etra

Case Details

Full title:BENTHOS MASTER FUND, LTD., Petitioner, v. AARON ETRA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 11, 2022

Citations

20-CV-3384 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2022)