From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bent v. Commissioner

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 1932
56 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1932)

Opinion

No. 6450.

February 8, 1932.

Upon Petition to Review an Order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Julius V. Patrosso, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John G. Remey, John H. McEvers, and Wm. Earl Smith, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and James K. Polk, Jr., Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.


In pursuance of stipulation, the judgment in this case shall follow the judgment in case No. 6449, H. Stanley Bent v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.C.A.) 56 F.2d 99.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Bent v. Commissioner

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 1932
56 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1932)
Case details for

Bent v. Commissioner

Case Details

Full title:Arthur S. BENT, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 1932

Citations

56 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1932)