Opinion
No. 20150232.
02-18-2016
Barry BENSON, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.
Lee M. Grossman, Valley City, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Asmundur Swain Benson III (argued), State's Attorney, and Anthony Swain Benson (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bottineau, ND for respondent and appellee.
Lee M. Grossman, Valley City, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Asmundur Swain Benson III (argued), State's Attorney, and Anthony Swain Benson (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bottineau, ND for respondent and appellee.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Barry Benson appealed a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Benson argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing his application because he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his counsel's failure to object to certain witness testimony. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.