From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benson v. State

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 18, 2016
876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)

Opinion

No. 20150232.

02-18-2016

Barry BENSON, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

Lee M. Grossman, Valley City, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Asmundur Swain Benson III (argued), State's Attorney, and Anthony Swain Benson (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bottineau, ND for respondent and appellee.


Lee M. Grossman, Valley City, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Asmundur Swain Benson III (argued), State's Attorney, and Anthony Swain Benson (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bottineau, ND for respondent and appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Barry Benson appealed a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Benson argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing his application because he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his counsel's failure to object to certain witness testimony. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Benson v. State

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 18, 2016
876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)
Case details for

Benson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Barry Benson, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Feb 18, 2016

Citations

876 N.W.2d 485 (N.D. 2016)
2016 N.D. 22

Citing Cases

Benson v. Braun

The North Dakota Supreme Court summarily affirmed. Benson v. State, 2016 ND 22, 876 N.W.2d 485. The court…