From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benson v. Fort Mill Schs. / York Cnty. Dist. 4

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2022
3:22-cv-00071-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00071-FDW-DCK

02-28-2022

ALEXIS BENSON and KEVIN CARBERRY, Sr., o/b/o K.C., JR. Plaintiff, v. FORT MILL SCHOOLS/YORK COUNTY DISTRICT 4, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on initial review of Plaintiff's Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). [Doc. 1].

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, who are residents of Fort Mill, South Carolina, filed this action on February 22, 2022 on behalf of their minor child against the Fort Mills School District, also referred to as York County District 4; numerous individual Defendants, all of whom are identified as employees of the Fort Mills School District; and Douglas Dent and his non-profit, Greenville Revitalization Corporation. [Doc. 1 at 1]. Fort Mills is in state of South Carolina. Plaintiffs do not allege where the individual Defendants reside. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the Constitution and federal law in relation to their autistic minor child's schooling and related experiences with Defendants, which all appear to have occurred in Fort Mill, South Carolina. [See Doc. 1].

II. DISCUSSION

Venue is established by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), which provides: (b) A civil action may be brought in: (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.

Therefore, under Section 1391, Plaintiffs action may be heard in a venue where all the defendants reside, or in the venue where the issue substantially arose, which here is the District of South Carolina. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the Court may dismiss this action, or, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The Court will transfer this action to the District of South Carolina.

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated herein, the Court transfers this action to the District of South Carolina.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff s action is transferred to the District of South Carolina.

2. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action.


Summaries of

Benson v. Fort Mill Schs. / York Cnty. Dist. 4

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2022
3:22-cv-00071-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Benson v. Fort Mill Schs. / York Cnty. Dist. 4

Case Details

Full title:ALEXIS BENSON and KEVIN CARBERRY, Sr., o/b/o K.C., JR. Plaintiff, v. FORT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 28, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00071-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2022)