From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benson v. Family Tree Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 7, 2021
No. 20-2943 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

20-2943

09-07-2021

John Benson; Brian Benson Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Family Tree Corporation, Inc.; Desert Partners IV, L.P. Defendants Ann Kemske; Jon Kemske Defendants-Appellees Brigham Oil & Gas, LP; Oasis Petroleum Incorporated Defendants Jodee Lawler; Carolyn Probst; Judge Robin Schmidt Movants


Unpublished

Submitted: August 31, 2021

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action, Minnesota residents John and Brian Benson appeal the district court's grant of the defendants' motion to dismiss based on res judicata. We affirm.

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendation of the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

To begin, we conclude the defendants properly raised the defense of res judicata in their motion to dismiss. See C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 695 F.3d 758, 763-64 (8th Cir. 2012) (res judicata may be raised as affirmative defense in motion to dismiss; Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal appropriately based on affirmative defense apparent from face of the complaint, public records, and materials embraced by the complaint). Further, we need not reach the Bensons' claim for declaratory relief argument because they did not raise it in their response to the motion to dismiss and instead urged the district court to accept the magistrate judge's report and recommendation concluding the claim was barred by claim preclusion. See Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharms., Inc., 679 F.3d 1062, 1067 (8th Cir. 2012) (A party "must present all his claims squarely to the magistrate judge . . . to preserve them for review.").

Finally, after careful de novo review, we conclude that dismissal of the Bensons' tort claims was proper. See Laase v. County of Isanti, 638 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo the grant of motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim based on res judicata and relying on the law of forum that rendered first judgment to control res judicata analysis); see also Finstad v. Beresford Bancorp., 831 F.3d 1009, 1013 (8th Cir. 2016) (noting elements of claim preclusion under North Dakota law). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Benson v. Family Tree Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 7, 2021
No. 20-2943 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Benson v. Family Tree Corp.

Case Details

Full title:John Benson; Brian Benson Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Family Tree…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

No. 20-2943 (8th Cir. Sep. 7, 2021)

Citing Cases

Finneman v. Laidlaw

The Eighth Circuit has ruled that a party may file a motion to dismiss which raises res judicata as an…