From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benson v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Oct 29, 2013
Case No. 4:13-cv-01025-MHH-HGD (N.D. Ala. Oct. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 4:13-cv-01025-MHH-HGD

10-29-2013

WINSTON BENSON, Petitioner v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 8, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Petitioner was granted an extension of time to September 20, 2013, in which to file objections; however, petitioner has not filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The Court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

___________________

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Benson v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
Oct 29, 2013
Case No. 4:13-cv-01025-MHH-HGD (N.D. Ala. Oct. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Benson v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON BENSON, Petitioner v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 4:13-cv-01025-MHH-HGD (N.D. Ala. Oct. 29, 2013)

Citing Cases

Hightower v. Davenport

In other words, it is readily apparent to the undersigned that Hightower only raises questions of pure state…