From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bensi v. Litke Props. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03875 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03875 EMC

11-17-2011

PAUL BENSI, BART FLORENCE, JERRY KALMAR, and LYLE SETTER, in their capacities as Trustees of the STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 PENSION TRUST FUND; STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND; and STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 ANNUITY TRUST FUND, Plaintiffs, v. LITKE PROPERTIES, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant.

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation WILLIAM A. SOKOL LINDA BALDWIN JONES EZEKIEL D. CARDER Attorneys for Plaintiffs ABRAHAM LAW OFFICES A.K. ABRAHAM Attorneys for Defendant


WILLIAM A. SOKOL, Bar No. 072740

LINDA BALDWIN JONES, Bar No. 178922

EZEKIEL D. CARDER, Bar No. 206537

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO

ANSWER COMPLAINT ; ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on or around August 8, 2011, and Defendant was served with the Complaint and Summons on or around August 26, 2011. On September 2, 2011, the Parties submitted a Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Answer Complaint ("Stipulation") extending Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint to September 30, 2011. The Court so Ordered the Stipulation on September 16, 2011. Defendant has now retained new counsel, the Abraham Law Offices, to represent them in this action, who needs additional time to familiarize himself with the pending action prior to filing an answer. With this stipulation, Defendant's deadline for answering and or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended to December 2, 2011.

The parties submit that the additional time will not alter any deadline set by the Court, and agree that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this stipulation is respectfully submitted to the Court for approval without the necessity of a hearing or Order.

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

WILLIAM A. SOKOL

LINDA BALDWIN JONES

EZEKIEL D. CARDER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ABRAHAM LAW OFFICES

A.K. ABRAHAM

Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Edward M. Chen

U.S. District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I am a citizen of the United States and an employee in the County of Alameda, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200, Alameda, California 94501-1091. On November 17, 2011, I served upon the following parties in this action:

A.K. Abraham
Abraham Law Offices
155 Bovet Road
Suite 780
San Mateo, CA 94402
copies of the document(s) described as:

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

[X] BY MAIL I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be placed in the United States mail at Alameda, California. I am readily familiar with the practice of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing, said practice being that in the ordinary course of business, mail is deposited in the United States Postal Service the same day as it is placed for collection.

[ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and caused the same to be delivered by hand to the offices of each addressee.

[ ] BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY SERVICE I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and placed the same for collection by Overnight Delivery Service by following the ordinary business practices of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Alameda, California. I am readily familiar with the practice of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for collection and processing of Overnight Delivery Service correspondence, said practice being that in the ordinary course of business, Overnight Delivery Service correspondence is deposited at the Overnight Delivery Service offices for next day delivery the same day as Overnight Delivery Service correspondence is placed for collection.

[ ] BY FACSIMILE I caused to be transmitted each document listed herein via the fax number(s) listed above or on the attached service list.

I certify under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed at Alameda, California, on November 17, 2011.

Joanna Son


Summaries of

Bensi v. Litke Props. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03875 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Bensi v. Litke Props. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL BENSI, BART FLORENCE, JERRY KALMAR, and LYLE SETTER, in their…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03875 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)