From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. York

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2929 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2929 DAD (TEMP) P.

April 4, 2011


ORDER


A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of his current address.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

DATED: April 1, 2011.


Summaries of

Bennett v. York

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2929 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Bennett v. York

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. YORK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2929 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)