From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 20, 2018
No. 18-6226 (4th Cir. Jul. 20, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6226

07-20-2018

CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN WOLFE; LIBRARIAN JUNE BRITTINGHAM; L.T. VANESSA JONES; SECRETARY STEPHEN MOYER; COMMISSIONER DAYENA CORCORAN; COMMISSIONER CAROLYN SCRUGS, Defendants - Appellees.

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-04069-JKB) Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on Bennett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and dismissing his claim challenging his infraction without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. Wolfe, No. 1:16-cv-04069-JKB (D. Md. Feb. 20, 2018). We deny Bennett's motion to order defendants to provide a copying card and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bennett v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 20, 2018
No. 18-6226 (4th Cir. Jul. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Bennett v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN WOLFE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 20, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6226 (4th Cir. Jul. 20, 2018)