From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 11, 2018
No. 17-7168 (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-7168

01-11-2018

CHAUNCEY BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN WOLFE; LIEUTENANT RUBY WHITE; LIEUTENANT VALERIE STYLES; LIEUTENANT TROXELL; STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary, Defendants - Appellees.

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Marie Kelly, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00302-JKB) Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Marie Kelly, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. Wolfe, No. 1:17-cv-00302-JKB (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bennett v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 11, 2018
No. 17-7168 (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Bennett v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:CHAUNCEY BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN WOLFE; LIEUTENANT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 11, 2018

Citations

No. 17-7168 (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2018)