From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Winn

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 10, 2022
4:17-cv-12249 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

4:17-cv-12249

02-10-2022

JOHN ERIC BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. O'BELL T. WINN, et al., Defendants.


Judge Matthew F. Leitman

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND RESOLVING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES (ECF No. 89)

ANTHONY P. PATTI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter came before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's amended motion to compel discovery responses (ECF No. 89), Defendants' response in opposition (ECF No. 92), Plaintiff's reply (ECF No. 93), and the parties' joint statement of unresolved issues (ECF No. 95). Judge Leitman referred the motion to me for a hearing and determination. (ECF No. 90.) A hearing was held on February 10, 2022, at which counsel for both parties appeared and the Court entertained oral argument regarding the motion.

Upon consideration of the motion papers and oral argument, and for all of the reasons stated on the record by the Court, which are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully restated herein, Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery responses (ECF No. 89) is DENIED IN PART and RESOLVED IN PART. Insofar as Plaintiff seeks to compel responses to Request for Production Nos. 21 and 22 in his Second Set of Discovery Requests (see ECF No. 82-2, PageID.1759-1760), that part of the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the parties' effort to resolve the issue through the newly-filed motion for protective order and to quash (ECF No. 96). Insofar as Plaintiff seeks to compel a response to Request for Production No. 2 in his First Set of Discovery Requests (see ECF No. 82-5, PageID.1772-1773), the parties stipulated on the record to the following language, after the Court ruled on scope and gave further guidance, as follows:

Defendants shall produce all Critical Incident Reports and related writings from November 2012 to November 2018 regarding violence against inmates, including gang-related assaults and violence against staff members involving weapons.
Personal identifying information regarding staff members other than names shall be redacted.
Personal identifying information regarding prisoner victims up to January 10, 2014, shall be produced pursuant to protective order.
Personal identifying information for prisoner victims after January 10, 2014, shall be redacted.
These Critical Incident Reports should include those occurring in Housing Unit #600 and all gang-related assaults or stabbing incidents perpetrated by prison gangs.
Defendants must PRODUCE the above documents by Thursday, March 3, 2022.

The Court awards no costs, neither party having prevailed in full. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(5)(C).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Winn

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 10, 2022
4:17-cv-12249 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Bennett v. Winn

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ERIC BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. O'BELL T. WINN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

4:17-cv-12249 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 10, 2022)