From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Windstead

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4359 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4359.

April 26, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of Tina Bennett's petition for writ ofhabeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry # 1), the defendants' response thereto (docket entry # 14), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (docket entry # 15), and the Court finding that it agrees with Judge Perkin's conclusions regarding the meritlessness of Bennett's exhausted and unexhausted claims, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry # 1) is DENIED;

3. Bennett having failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we DECLINE to issue a certificate of appealability; and

4. The Clerk of Court shall statistically CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Windstead

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4359 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Bennett v. Windstead

Case Details

Full title:TINA BENNETT v. RHODA WINDSTEAD, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 26, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4359 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2011)