From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Werlinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 22, 2013
Civil Action No. 10 - 172J (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10 - 172J

05-22-2013

PATRICK R. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ROBERT WERLINGER, Respondent.


District Judge Kim R. Gibson

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan on April 1, 2013. (ECF No. 33.) Judge Lenihan recommended that Petitioner's Motion to Reopen this case (ECF No. 25) be granted and that supplemental briefing be ordered on whether this Court has jurisdiction over Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Both Petitioner and Respondent have filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (ECF Nos. 34, 35.) Upon review, however, the objections do not undermine the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. As such, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated April 1, 2013 (ECF No. 33) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Respondents shall then have forty-five (45) days to file an Answer to the Amended Petition addressing, inter alia, whether Petitioner has met the In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245 (3d Cir. 1997) exception and this Court has jurisdiction over the petition, whether United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008) and Cueller v. United States, 553 U.S. 550 (2008) are substantive changes in statutory law with retroactive application, and whether these cases have application to Petitioner's conviction so as to make it more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him.

By the Court:

____________________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge
cc: Patrick R. Bennett

38551-054

Loretto

Federal Correctional Institution

P.O. Box 1000

Loretto, PA 15940

(Via U.S. Postal Mail)

Counsel of Record

(Via ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Bennett v. Werlinger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 22, 2013
Civil Action No. 10 - 172J (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Bennett v. Werlinger

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK R. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ROBERT WERLINGER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 22, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 10 - 172J (W.D. Pa. May. 22, 2013)