Opinion
No. 05-05-00573-CR
Opinion Filed January 9, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-71057-KN. Affirmed.
Before Justices O'NEILL, FITZGERALD, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Marques Davon Bennett pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver phencyclidine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on five years' community supervision, and assessed a $1500 fine. The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated several conditions of community supervision. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations, and following a hearing, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.