From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 25, 1986
495 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-1768.

September 25, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Putnam County, Robert R. Perry, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph N. D'Achille, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant argues that the application of section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), in the present case is an impermissible ex post facto application of the statute, since appellant's offenses were committed prior to July, 1985. Appellant is correct. See Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Yost v. State, 489 So.2d 131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus, the application of section 27.3455 to the present sentence is reversed. The remainder of the sentence is affirmed.

REVERSED in part; AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bennett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 25, 1986
495 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Bennett v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARVID LUTHER BENNETT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 25, 1986

Citations

495 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. State

Stanley was charged by information on November 21, 1984.Gordon v. State, 497 So.2d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986);…

Stone v. State

This issue has been raised repeatedly in this district and in other districts The first case to decide this…