From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. St. Louis Hotel

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Jan 12, 1977
341 So. 2d 642 (La. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 8062.

January 12, 1977.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, NO. 601-376, DIVISION "H", STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE OLIVER P. CARRIERE, J.

Wayne H. Carlton, Jr., Orlando G. Bendana, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

John F. Caraway, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before REDMANN, STOULIG and MORIAL, JJ.


Plaintiff's appeal seeks attorney's fees and immediate exigibility of a judgment for workmen's compensation benefits.

A judgment of March 10, 1976 awarded $62.40 a week "from June 30, 1975 to date" and "further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to future compensation benefits at the rate of $62.40 a week, plus all medical expenses, pending further orders of this court."

Defendants paid the compensation up to the date of that judgment but did not begin paying the "further compensation benefits" the judgment declared due.

Plaintiff waited silently until May 11 and then filed this rule to make all benefits immediately exigible under R.S. 23:1333. Kirby v. Crystal Oil Rfg. Corp., 2 Cir. 1930, 14 La.App. 115, 129 So. 385, Correctly decided that § 1333 penalizes only a wilful refusal to pay adjudicated compensation benefits.

There is no factual showing that the refusal to pay was wilful prior to the May 11 filing of the rule. But it is clear that the refusal to pay thereafter and through the June 11 trial was wilful. However, defendant's original unwilful failure to pay "six successive installments as they become due" cannot be added to its wilful failure to pay the fewer-than-six installments which matured between filing and trial of the rule. The statute only penalizes wilfulness that has endured through six successive installments.

We also reject plaintiff's claim for attorney's fees (and penalty?) under R.S. 22:658. That statute applies to an initial claim; an initial judgment might award compensation and penalty and attorney's fees, but failure to pay the judgment does not evoke further penalty and attorney's fees. The statutory remedy for (wilful) failure to pay a judgment is provided by R.S. 23:1333. There are, moreover, means of enforcing judgments (both by executing and by contempt proceedings).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bennett v. St. Louis Hotel

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Jan 12, 1977
341 So. 2d 642 (La. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Bennett v. St. Louis Hotel

Case Details

Full title:PASTEL BENNETT v. ST. LOUIS HOTEL ET AL

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 1977

Citations

341 So. 2d 642 (La. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Mason v. C C C Express, Inc.

Those requirements include a showing that the employer's failure to pay the installments was a willful…

Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc.

The Eisel opinion expressly referred to this Mason decision as the basis for a prerequisite prior demand by…