From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2010
Case No. 1:09-CV-00879-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-CV-00879-LJO-MJS.

December 30, 2010


ORDER


Date Action Filed: May 18, 2009

The court has before it the Parties' "Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice as to Plaintiff Todd Bennett. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed.R.Civ.P., plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Further, the parties may stipulate that the dismissal be with prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(B).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Parties Stipulation for Dismissal. IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. All the claims of all the parties in Bennett, Case No. 1:09-CV-00879-LJO-MJS having been dismissed with prejudice, this action is terminated.

Dated: __ December 30, 2010


Summaries of

Bennett v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 30, 2010
Case No. 1:09-CV-00879-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Bennett v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

Case Details

Full title:TODD BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:09-CV-00879-LJO-MJS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2010)