From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Shoemaker

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2022
1:22-cv-0354 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-0354

08-11-2022

JAMAL BENNETT, Plaintiff v. BRAD SHOEMAKER and MARK LUSK, Defendants


ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, on this 11th day of August 2022, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 3) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff Jamal Bennett's complaint (Doc. No. 1-2 at 3-20) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted;

3. Bennett's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED;

4. Bennett's motion for permissive joinder (Doc. No. 10) and motion for leave to amend (Doc. No. 12) are GRANTED only to the extent that Bennett may file an amended complaint in conformity with the Memorandum accompanying this Order on or before September 9, 2022; and

5. If no amended complaint is timely filed, the Court will CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Shoemaker

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2022
1:22-cv-0354 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Bennett v. Shoemaker

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL BENNETT, Plaintiff v. BRAD SHOEMAKER and MARK LUSK, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 11, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-0354 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2022)