From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Septa

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 2, 2024
Civil Action 23-1271 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-1271

02-02-2024

DEBORAH BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. SEPTA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 15), all briefs and exhibits filed in support of the Motion and Plaintiff's Response, (ECF No. 16), Defendant's Reply (ECF No. 17), Plaintiff's Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 56(d), (ECF No. 22), Defendants' Response (ECF 26), and after holding oral argument, (ECF No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and judgment shall be entered in favor of Scott Sauer and SEPTA.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 56(d) is DENIED. See Footnotes 6 and 18 in the Court's accompanying Memorandum.

3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Septa

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 2, 2024
Civil Action 23-1271 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Bennett v. Septa

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. SEPTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-1271 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2024)