From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 8, 2016
3:16-cv-00420-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00420-RCJ-WGC

11-08-2016

GREGORY J. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER

Gregory Bennett is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections. He filed a Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing the Petition without prejudice because Petitioner complained of constitutional violations at his trial in state court that were not cognizable under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The Court agreed. The Court later denied a motion to recuse (and it hereby denies a successive motion to recuse currently pending). Petitioner appealed, and the Court of Appeals has remanded for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. The Court finds that it should not, because the appeal is frivolous. See Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). /// ///

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Recuse (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is REVOKED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 8th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bennett v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 8, 2016
3:16-cv-00420-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Bennett v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY J. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 8, 2016

Citations

3:16-cv-00420-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 8, 2016)