From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Jolley

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 16, 2013
NUMBER 13-12-00752-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2013)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00752-CV

05-16-2013

STEPHEN BENNETT, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY JOLLEY, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Aransas County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 29, 2013. On April 8, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Bennett v. Jolley

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 16, 2013
NUMBER 13-12-00752-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Bennett v. Jolley

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BENNETT, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY JOLLEY, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: May 16, 2013

Citations

NUMBER 13-12-00752-CV (Tex. App. May. 16, 2013)