From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BENNETT v. IRON CLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1908
127 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

July, 1908.


The plaintiff is the patentee of certain metal seamless baskets. He made a contract with the defendant granting it the right to make and sell the same, and the defendant agreed to pay therefor as a royalty a fixed price. It is contended by the plaintiff that the defendant made and sold baskets, for which the royalty has not been paid. The action is brought to recover the same, and a verdict was rendered in plaintiff's favor for the sum of $540. From the judgment entered thereon, and the order denying the defendant's motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals. The case has been before us once before, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed and a new trial granted. ( Bennett v. Iron Clad Manufacturing Co., 121 App. Div. 133.) The crucial fact in controversy between these parties is not the number of seamless baskets which the defendant manufactured and sold. That does not seem to be in dispute; but whether any of them, and if so how many, were of the kind and embodied the special features, and are covered by the contract between the parties. The defendant contends, and has contended all the way through this litigation, that since the judgment in the action between these same parties declaring the contract forfeited and canceled ( Bennett v. Iron Clad Manufacturing Co., 90 App. Div. 611), it has not manufactured or sold metal baskets of the description or kind covered by the contract. I do not see that the plaintiff's case is any stronger than it was when here before, and we reversed the judgment. There is more evidence of the same kind, but it is lacking in probative force upon the question in dispute. The essential element showing that the defendant manufactured and sold baskets embodying the special features named in the contract, is wanting. I think the judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted. All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and fact.


Summaries of

BENNETT v. IRON CLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1908
127 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

BENNETT v. IRON CLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS BENNETT, Respondent, v . IRON CLAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1908

Citations

127 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Citing Cases

People v. Risley

Judgment was had in favor of plaintiff; an appeal was again taken to the Appellate Division by the company,…