From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Genesee Marina, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 14, 1997.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs allege that defendants are liable for the damage to their boats caused by a fire at defendants' marina. Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motions to strike defendants' third and sixth affirmative defenses, which allege contractual release of liability, and properly denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaints. We agree with defendants that the boat space rental agreement at issue constituted a license, not a lease of real property, and that General Obligations Law § 5-321 therefore is inapplicable ( see, Brown v Town of Clarence, 181 AD2d 1055, 1056). Nevertheless, we conclude that the release provision does not unequivocally state that it encompasses the liability of defendants for their own negligent acts and, thus, it is not sufficiently explicit to exculpate defendants from the consequences of their own negligence ( see, Gross v Sweet, 49 NY2d 102, 107-109). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Bennett v. Genesee Marina, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Bennett v. Genesee Marina, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BENNETT, Respondent, v. GENESEE MARINA, INC., Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 1013

Citing Cases

Skaneateles Country Club v. Cambs

The subject Agreement involves real property as it provides defendant with the privilege of using and…

Segale v. Nu Wave Marine, Inc.

Nevertheless, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment based on a clause in the parties' agreement in…