From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-212-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-212-N

07-12-2012

ROY BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Since Plaintiff has timely filed an amended complaint as allowed by the recommendation, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support or Alternatively Motion for More Definite Statement, filed January 26, 2012 (doc. 5), is DENIED as moot. This action will now proceed on the amended complaint.

_________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bennett v. Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-212-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Bennett v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:ROY BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-212-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 12, 2012)